论文部分内容阅读
法律实质类推应该是包括类推适用或判例类推在内的法律审判类推的普遍模式。法律实质类推与其他类比推理的区别在于:是否关注类推对象相似性的品质以及是否关注类推所依据的理由。法律实质类推这两个要求的内容,理应写进法律逻辑的教材,在法律类推的定义和公式中得到体现。法律实质类推结论的可靠性强于一般的类推,但仍然不具有必然性,无法完全避免不确定性;法律实质类推这种先天的不足与法律确定性要求之间的协调,需要自身完善和宽容理性两方面同时给力。
The legal analogy should be a universal analogy of legal analogy including analogy or analogy. The difference between legal analogies and other analogical inferences is whether they pay attention to the quality of similar analogy and whether they are concerned with the reasons on which analogy is based. The essence of the legal analogy The content of these two requirements should be written into the legal logic of the teaching materials, analogy in the definition and formula to be reflected. The conclusion of law of law is more reliable than general analogy, but it still does not have necessity and can not completely avoid the uncertainty. The legal analogy between congenital deficiency and legal certainty requires self-consummation and tolerance rationality Both at the same time to force.