论文部分内容阅读
将一次文献、二次文献、三次文献统称文献的级别似乎已成定论。这是否恰当?文献的级别是什么?本文初步探讨文献分级的重要性,分级方法等问题。现称的文献级别应是文献的次别。“级”的原义是等级。如技术、工资的级别。苏联学者认为;如以对一次文献进行文献加工整理的程度为区别标准,则从字面上看,所谓三次文献应是对二次文献加工整理的结果。但现称的二次文献和三次文献之间没有这种联系。作者也认为正如将1次、2次、3次火车列车称为火车的次别一样,应将一次、二次、三次文献称为文献的次别,而不应称为文献的级别。
It seems that the level of literature, secondary literature, and literature for three times has become a definite conclusion. Is this appropriate? What is the level of the literature? This article initially discusses the importance of classification of documents, grading methods and other issues. The current level of documentation should be the second of the literature. The original meaning of “level” is level. Such as technology, salary level. According to the Soviet scholars, if the extent to which a document is processed and processed is the standard of distinction, then literally, the so-called three documents should be the result of processing and processing of the second document. However, there is no such link between what is now referred to as the second and the third. The author also believes that once, twice, three train trains as the train times, the first, second and third documents should be referred to as the literature, rather than as the literature level.