论文部分内容阅读
基层“双争”评比的方法是否简便易行,科学规范,便于操作,是关系到经常性“双争”活动评比健康发展的关键问题.从实践情况看,必须抛弃那种量化打分的繁琐做法,以《纲要》为基本依据,坚持做到三个结合渗透:即把经常性“双争”评比结合渗透到落实《纲要》规定的7项经常性工作中;结合渗透到落实各项规章制度中;结合渗透到完成急难险重任务和临时性突击工作中。这样做既便于基层落实,又便于机关检查指导,同时也能促进经常性工作的落实。
Whether the method of grassroots “double competition ” is simple, scientifical and standard, and easy to operate is the key issue that relates to the healthy development of the competition “competition ” .From practice, we must abandon the kind of quantification The tedious practice of scoring, based on the “Outline”, insisted on three combinations of penetration: the combination of regular “double-win” evaluation with the implementation of the seven recurrent tasks stipulated in the “Outline”; the combination of infiltration To the implementation of the rules and regulations; combined penetration to complete the task of emergency and temporary surprise work. This will not only facilitate implementation at the grass-roots level but also facilitate inspection and guidance by the authorities as well as facilitate the implementation of regular work.