论文部分内容阅读
产权理论历史发展可划分为三个阶段。所有权具有宏观和微观双向研究性：从宏观 上研究即形成所有制理论；从微观上研究即定位为产权理论。现代产权经济学研究的产权， 是体现现代所有权变革的崭新概念，即所有权的结构组合形式范围。西方产权经济学的实质 ，是要抓住制度与效率之间的内在联系，做好产权制度安排，达到产权效率支配状态最优。 马克思所有制理论和西方产权经济学，作为相连的两个阶段，具有不同的研究定位，形成不 同的研究领域和研究重点，表现出很大的互补性。《产权分析的两种范式》一文把这二者“ 对立”起来的看法是不正确的，对西方产权经济学及其在中国改革中的作用，应进行实事求 是地评价。 本文是作者承担国家 社会科学基金项目“建立有效的国有资产管理、监督和营运机制问题研究”的一个阶段成果 。
The historical development of property rights theory can be divided into three stages. Ownership has the macro and micro two-way research: from the macro-level theory that is the formation of ownership theory; from the micro-research that is positioned as property rights theory. The property right of modern property economics research is a brand-new concept that reflects the reform of modern ownership, that is, the scope of the structural combination form of ownership. The essence of Western property economics is to seize the intrinsic link between system and efficiency, do a good job institutional arrangements for property rights, to achieve the optimal ownership of property efficiency. Marxist ownership theory and Western property economics, as two connected stages, have different research orientation, forming different research fields and research focuses, showing great complementarity. The two paradigms of property right analysis put the two in opposition to one another. This is an incorrect assessment of the economics of Western property rights and its role in China’s reform. This article is a result of the author’s commitment to the project of “Establishing an Effective Research on the Management, Supervision and Operation Mechanism of State-owned Assets” of the National Social Science Fund Project.