论文部分内容阅读
当下中国社会,环境侵权问题日益突出,关于环境侵权责任中数人侵权行为责任的问题在法学理论界更是众说纷纭,争论的焦点主要集中于《侵权责任法》第67条的解读上,尤其对两个以上污染者污染环境究竟属于何种责任形式这一问题,各持不同意见。随着2015年《环境侵权司法解释》的出台,更引起的理论界的新一轮讨论,为此,本论文将从各方角度来分析环境侵权责任中数人侵权行为责任问题,结合国内外相关立法例,从《环境侵权司法解释》的角度来理解《侵权责任法》的相关法条,最后又脱离出该司法解释,并以新的法条解释角度来看待该问题,给往后解读法条提供思考方向:1.从具有相似语言结构的其他法条角度来解读第67条。2.从数学逻辑角度来解读第67条。
At present, the issue of environmental infringement is becoming more and more prominent in China. The issue of the liability of several human rights violations in environmental tort liability is even more controversial in jurisprudential theory circles. The focus of the debate is mainly on the interpretation of Article 67 of Tort Liability Law, Whether two or more polluters pollute the environment belong to what form of responsibility this issue, each disagree. With the introduction of the “Environmental Judicial Interpretation of Environment” in 2015, a new round of theoretical discussions is aroused. For this reason, this dissertation will analyze the responsibility of several human rights violations in environmental tort liability from all angles, Related Legislation, from the perspective of “judicial interpretation of environmental tort”, it understands the related law of “Tort Liability Act” and finally departs from this judicial explanation, and interprets it from the perspective of new interpretation of laws Article provides the direction of thinking: 1. Interpretation of Article 67 from the perspective of other articles of similar linguistic structure. Interpret Article 67 from the perspective of mathematical logic.