论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨无痛人工流产和传统人工流产术式选择对重复流产的影响。方法选择我院在2011年1月到2011年6月收治的116例需要进行人工流产的患者,根据患者的意愿分为无痛人工流产组和传统人工流产组。结果前次进行无痛人工流产组患者的重复流产率比传统人工流产组的患者高(P<0.05),两组患者在前次流产后避孕情况和恢复性生活的时间等均具有统计学意义。结论无痛人工流产虽然解决了患者疼痛的问题,但是术后的重复流产率较高,因此要加强无痛人工流产术后的计划生育宣传工作。
Objective To investigate the effect of painless induced abortion and traditional abortion on repeated abortion. Methods One hundred and sixty-six patients who underwent induced abortion in our hospital from January 2011 to June 2011 were divided into painless abortion group and traditional abortion group according to patients’ wishes. Results Compared with the traditional abortion group, the repeat abortion rate in the painless induced abortion group was higher than that in the traditional abortion group (P <0.05). The contraceptive status and the time of resuming life in the two groups after the abortion were statistically significant . Conclusion Although painless abortion solves the problem of pain in patients, the rate of postoperative repeated abortion is high. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen family planning publicity after painless artificial abortion.