综合我国基本权利谱系、基本权利条款间的关系及立法意图,既不宜对言论作字面解释,将其含义限定为口头形式,同时也不宜作过分的扩充解释。我国《宪法》第35条意义上的言论,不仅包括口头形式,还应包括书面形式,但已成为基本权利或可以被其他基本权利条款所包摄的表达形式不在言论范畴。 To sum up the relationship between the basic rights clause and the provisions of the basic rights in our country and the legislative intent, we should neither interpret the speech in a literal way, limit its meaning to the verbal form, nor should it make undue expansive explanations. In the sense of Article 35 of the Constitution of our country, not only verbal forms but also written forms, which are already basic rights or can be covered by other provisions of fundamental rights, are not included in the scope of speech.