《日本家用电器回收法》于2001年4月开始全面实施。尽管该法律在实施前后均备受争议和非难,但大部分都未以实际数据为依据。目前这一法律已经实施四年,其成效可以通过实践经验而不是理论来加以评价。因此本文对该法律进行了经验性评估,并对评估框架以及所设计的目标进行了详细分析,结论如下:A.对于物流循环绩效而言,尽管该法律已顺利执行,但是需要保证原料的收集以避免不正当的处理;B.对于循环系统的成本效益和资金流动而言,成本效益大致保持在法律颁布前的水平上,进一步降低成本的措施有待发掘;C.对于循环系统的边界问题而言,在总的四类废弃目标家电(即:电视机,电冰箱和冰柜,洗衣机和空调)当中,仅有43%的废家电送往循环回收厂,22%的废家电不知去向。同时调查发现,废家电非法弃置尚未增长到让公众恐慌的地步;废空调的数量有一定程度的减少,然而废电视机的数目有了显著增加。除此之外,另有未被列为回收目录中的其他的家用电器,其数量和重量上分别占到所列49种家用电器的80%和25%;D.从各利益相关方的行为转变而言,尽管从立法角度希望家电报废的数量越少越好,事实上其报废减少的幅度非常有限。一些零售商无目的的收集废家电很有可能进一步导致家电的不当处理;但该法律对家电生产商产生了积极影响,促使他们想方设法改变产品设计。 The Japan Household Appliance Recycling Law was fully implemented in April 2001. Although the law was controversial and blameworthy both before and after its implementation, most are not based on actual data. At present, this law has been implemented for four years and its effectiveness can be evaluated through practical experience rather than theory. Therefore, this article conducted an empirical assessment of the law and made a detailed analysis of the evaluation framework and the designed objectives. The conclusions are as follows: A. For the logistics performance of circulation, although the law has been successfully implemented, but the need to ensure the collection of raw materials In order to avoid improper handling; B. For the cost-effectiveness of the recycling system and the flow of funds, the cost-effectiveness remained roughly the level of the law promulgated, further cost reduction measures to be explored; C. For the circulation system and According to the statement, only 43% of the waste household appliances were sent to the recycling plant for the total four types of waste-to-household appliances (ie TV sets, refrigerators and freezers, washing machines and air conditioners), and 22% of the waste household appliances disappeared. At the same time, the survey found that the illegal disposal of waste household appliances has not yet risen to the public panic; the number of waste air conditioning to some extent reduce, however, the number of waste television has increased significantly. In addition, other household appliances that are not listed in the Recycling Catalog account for 80% and 25% of the 49 listed household appliances in terms of quantity and weight, respectively; D. From the actions of various stakeholders In terms of change, in spite of the hope that the lesser amount of home appliances will be scrapped as possible from a legislative standpoint, the reduction in retirement is in fact very limited. Some retailers’ unintentional collection of used appliances is likely to further lead to improper handling of appliances; however, the law has had a positive effect on appliance manufacturers, prompting them to find ways to change product designs.