论文部分内容阅读
本文探讨了经济学学术期刊的评价问题。通过对国内5种经济学期刊评价指标的分析,本文得到两个结论:一是中国经济学期刊的整体进步明显;二是中国经济学期刊总体呈现出越来越规范的特点。同行评议审稿等规范化制度的引入对于改善期刊质量起到了关键的作用。在比较和借鉴国际一流期刊的基础上,本文也指出中国经济学期刊存在的不足之处,并给出若干改善期刊质量的建议。本文还阐述了经济学家对于论文写作、编辑以及审稿等相关问题的观点。
This article explores the evaluation of economics journals. Through the analysis of the evaluation index of the five domestic economic journals, this paper obtains two conclusions: First, the overall progress of the Chinese economic journals is obvious; Second, the Chinese Journals of Economics generally show more and more normative characteristics. The introduction of standardized systems, such as peer reviewers, has played a key role in improving journal quality. Based on the comparison and reference of international first-rate journals, this paper also points out the shortcomings of the Chinese economic journals and gives some suggestions to improve the quality of journals. This article also elaborates economists’ views on issues related to essay writing, editing, and reviewing.