论文部分内容阅读
随着翻译研究“文化转向”日趋盛行,以译入语为中心的翻译研究逐渐摆脱边缘地位,翻译研究与文化研究的结合也更为紧密。然而,目前翻译研究多注重对客观理论展开分析,缺少从微观个案,尤其是中国个案,入手对相关翻译理论进行深入具体的探讨。为此,本文应用勒菲弗尔的“论域”理论,详细解读王寿昌决定翻译《巴黎茶花女遗事》时为何选择林纾作为合作对象。希望本个案研究能使人们更好地理解勒菲弗尔的“操纵”理论以及文学翻译的复杂性,特别是翻译过程中文本操纵行为的重要性与必要性。
With the increasing popularity of translation studies and “cultural shift”, translation studies centered on translators are gradually getting rid of their marginalized positions and translation studies are more closely integrated with cultural studies. However, at present translation studies pay more attention to the analysis of objective theories. Starting from the microscopic case, especially the case of China, the translation studies begin with an in-depth and detailed discussion of related translation theories. For this reason, this article applies Le Favre’s theory of “discourse domain” to explain why Wang Shouchang decided to translate Lin Shu as a cooperation partner when deciding to translate the “Paris Lady of the Camellia”. It is hoped that this case study will enable people to better understand Le Favre’s theory of “manipulation” and the complexity of literary translation, especially the importance and necessity of text manipulation in translation.