论文部分内容阅读
《最高人民法院关于案例指导工作的规定》对指导性案例的效力定位并未十分明确,仅在该规定第七条中提到“最高人民法院发布的指导性案例,各级人民法院审判类似案例时应当参照”。何谓“应当参照”以及不“参照”的后果如何,在该规定中并未涉及。其效力定位又是案例指导制度建立的一个十分重要的基础理论性问题。本文在对两大法系判例制度中判例的效力定位分析的基础上,总结出适合我国国情的指导性案例的效力定位。
“Supreme People’s Court on the work of the guidance of the case,” the orientation of the effectiveness of the guidance is not very clear positioning, only in the provisions of Article VII of the “Supreme People’s Court issued a guiding case, the people’s court at all levels trial similar Case should be referred to ”. What is the consequence of “should be referenced” and not “reference” is not covered by this rule. The positioning of its effectiveness is a very important basic theoretical issue in the establishment of case guidance system. Based on the analysis of the validity of the precedents in the two jurisprudence cases, this article summarizes the validity of the guiding cases that fit the national conditions of our country.