论文部分内容阅读
甲骨卜辞时期,个体事物主要有“数+名”、“名+数”、“名_1+数+名_2”三种计数方式,“名_1+数+名_2”是“名+数+容器量词”、“名+数+集合量词”类推的产物,拷贝型量词是个体量词的最初形式。西周以后,拷贝型量词被一般名量词替代,量词观念开始建立。量词产生后,在不可数名词的数量结构的类推作用下数词后面添加量词成了一种规范。汉语“数+量+名”结构由不可数名词的计数结构“数+量+名”类推而来,同时也是汉语内部自我调整的产物。两种不同的语序“数+量+名”和“名+数+量”基本语义相同,均可用于计数和描写,只是表意的侧重点有所不同而已,但这种区别仅仅是倾向性的。因此,“名+数+量”和“数+量+名”具有相同的话语功能。
Oracle bone inscriptions, the individual things are mainly “number + name ”, “name + number ”, “name _1 + number + name _2 ” three kinds of counting method, “name _1 + number + The name _2 is the product of ”name + number + container quantifier “, ”name + number + aggregate quantifier “, and copy type quantifier is the initial form of individual quantifier. After the Western Zhou Dynasty, the copy-type quantifiers were replaced by the general-noun words, and the concept of quantifier began to be established. After the production of quantifiers, the addition of quantifiers after the numerals under the analogy of the number structure of uncountable nouns becomes a norm. The Chinese structure of ”number + quantity + name“ is derived from the counting structure of ”uncountable nouns“ and ”quantity + quantity + name“, and is also the product of internal self-adjustment in Chinese. Two different orders ”number + amount + name “ and ”name + number + amount “ the same basic semantics, can be used for counting and description, but the ideological focus is different, but this difference is only Is tendentious Therefore, ”name + number + quantity “ and ”number + quantity + name " have the same discourse function.