论文部分内容阅读
一家具有30多年历史,拥有1500多名职工的国营大厂,竟然被一家仅有140名职工的集体小厂兼并。奇怪吗?商品经济条件下的企业兼并,似乎只有“大鱼吃小鱼”才是天经地义的。而今天,这条颇有些名气的“娃哈哈”“小鱼”,竟然堂而皇之地吞掉了数倍于自身的“大鱼”——杭州罐头厂,的确令人吃惊不小。说怪也不怪,商品经济尽管信奉“大鱼吃小鱼”的信条,但它毕竟是建立在优胜劣汰的竞争规律基础之上的。优者胜,劣者汰,它既不考虑你的行政级
A state-owned factory with a history of more than 30 years and more than 1,500 employees was actually merged with a collective small factory with only 140 employees. Strange? The merger of companies under commodity economy conditions seems to be only “big fish to eat fish”. Today, this quite famous “Wahaha” and “little fish” actually swallowed several times its own “big fish” -- the canned factory in Hangzhou, indeed surprising. It is not surprising to say that even if the commodity economy believes in the creed of “big fish eat fish,” it is based on the competition laws of the survival of the fittest. The winner is good and the bad is eliminated. It does not consider your administrative level.