论文部分内容阅读
在当前我国期刊出版业內,存在着一个误区,普遍认为基金资助论文质量高于非基金资助论文。体现在办刊实践中,就是各期刊争相以优先发表、加快发表、减免版面费、支付高额稿费等形式,吸引基金资助论文。事实上,研究数据表明,基金资助论文质量并不必然就高。如果期刊编辑片面地以是否得到基金资助来决定论文的取舍,既不科学,对于非基金资助论文来说,也不公平。
In the current periodical publishing industry in China, there is a misunderstanding, generally believed that the quality of fund-funded papers than non-fund-funded papers. Reflected in the practice of running journals, that is, each journal competing to give priority to publish, speed up the publication, reduction of layout fees, payment of high royalties and other forms to attract funds to support the paper. In fact, the research data shows that the quality of fund-supported papers is not necessarily high. It is neither scientific nor scientific for journal editors to decide whether or not to treat a paper on the basis of whether or not it is funded by the fund. It is not fair for non-fund-funded research.