辞赋大家扬雄晚年悔赋,斥之为“壮夫不为”的“童子雕虫篆刻”;二百年后,年轻而善辞赋的曹植援引扬雄悔赋之先例,提出“辞赋小道,固未足以揄扬大义,彰显来世”。然而,将此二人同视作轻视辞赋、贬低文学价值的代表,实际上是千百年来的误读。扬曹对辞赋的贬低各有隐情,他们看似相似的辞赋观之间,更是存在不小的差异。 After 200 years, young and good coffin Cao cited the precedent of Yang Xiong remorse, put forward “” Fushi pathways, solid enough to raise awareness, show the afterlife ". However, treating these two people as the representatives who despise poetry and literature and belittle the value of literature is in fact a misunderstanding for thousands of years. Yang Cao’s censure of each have their own belittle, they seemingly similar between the concept of coffin, it is there is no small difference.