论文部分内容阅读
历来人们都试图从项羽这个角度来解释鸿门宴“樊哙闯帐”的情节合理性,李怡安老师认为项羽不杀樊哙是由于英雄惜英雄(参见《语文学习》2005.3《英雄惜英雄》一文),也是在这个大的阐释背景下衍生的观点,但这种解释并不令人信服。举一个最明显的例子, 《史记·项羽本纪》:“楚下荥阳城,生得周苛。项王谓周苛曰:‘为我将,我以公为上将军,封三万户。’周苛骂曰:‘若不趣降汉,汉今虏若,若非汉敌也。’项羽怒,烹周苛。”这里,刘邦的御史大夫周苛捋虎须、逆龙鳞、忠不避死,也是一个“大胆讲义”“粗犷豪爽”“光明磊落”的英雄,为什么没有受到项羽的礼遇,反而落得被烹的下场呢?笔者认为,樊哙之所以能不辱使命、全身远祸, 最主要还是得益于其高超的劝说艺术。试略论之。
Historically, people have tried to explain the plausibility of the Banquet of Fan Ban from Xiang Yu’s point of view. Li Yi’an believes that Xiang Yu’s failure to kill Fan Li is due to heroes and heroes (see “Language Learning”, “Heroes of Heroes”). This is a large interpretation of the background derived from the point of view, but this explanation is not convincing. To give one of the most obvious examples, “Shi Ji Xiang Yu Ji Ji”: “Chu Xia Chuan Yang City, born Zhou Zhou harsh. Xiang Wang said that Zhou Yan Xie: ’For me, I will use the public as the general, sealed 30,000.’ Zhou Harsh: ”If it is not fun to descend Han, the Han is squeaking, if not the Chinese enemy also.“ Xiang Yu anger, cooking Zhou harsh.” Here, Liu Bang’s civic doctor Zhou harsh tiger, inverse dragonscale, loyalty avoid Death is also a “bold handout”, “rough and forthright” and “bright and up-to-date” hero. Why didn’t he receive the courtesy of Xiang Yu but he ended up being cooked? The author believes that Fan Yu’s mission is to fulfill his mission and his whole body is far away from him. Still thanks to its superb persuasion. Try to talk about it.