目的:提高临床实验室对阴道细菌的检出率,筛选出较为准确的检验方法,进而提高妇科临床诊断的准确性。方法:收集2012年1月～2012年7月在我院妇科门诊就诊的99例BV患者,年龄在22～49岁之间,平均年龄为30岁。所有患者就诊时均有不同程度的外阴及阴道瘙痒症状,同时伴有白带等分泌物增加。无菌条件下于阴道后穹窿处取阴道分泌物,分别采用BV Set试剂盒进行检测,与Amsel标准进行对比分析。结果:在99例BV患者中,Amsel标准法确诊BV57例,占57.58%;BV Set试剂盒确诊BV53例,占53.54%,2种检测方法阳性率比较无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:两种检验法的细菌检验敏感性及特异性都较高,且操作过程相当简便快捷,可满足当今临床诊断的需要,值得在临床上推广。 Objective: To improve the detection rate of vaginal bacteria in clinical laboratory and screen out more accurate test methods to improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of gynecology. Methods: From January 2012 to July 2012, 99 patients with BV who were treated in gynecology clinic of our hospital were collected. The mean age was 30 years. All patients have varying degrees of vulva and vaginal itching symptoms, accompanied by leucorrhea and other secretions increased. Vaginal secretions were taken from the posterior fornix at aseptic conditions and tested by the BV Set kit, respectively, for comparison with the Amsel standard. Results: Of the 99 patients with BV, 57 were confirmed by Amsel’s standard method, accounting for 57.58%. The BV Set was confirmed by BV53 kit, accounting for 53.54%. There was no significant difference between the two methods (P> 0.05). Conclusion: The two tests have higher sensitivity and specificity in bacterial test, and the operation process is very simple and quick, which can meet the needs of clinical diagnosis nowadays and worth to be popularized clinically.