史料越来越成为历史高考中的重要元素。命题人挖空心思,遴选各种史料,设置各种题型,变换多种角度,或高端大气,或精巧细致,的确成就了不少经典试题,也对历史教学产生了正向的引导。但与此同时,在史料考查中,不规范、不严谨的现象时有发生,引起广大师生的争论,有损于高考的权威性。我们以为,守正才能创新。在命制史料类试题时,应该规范地引用史料,合理地解读史料。在规范与合理的基础上,方可不拘一格、百花齐放。那么,什么是规范?什 Historical data more and more become an important element in the history of college entrance examination. Proponents hollow themselves, select a variety of historical data, set a variety of questions, change a variety of perspectives, or the high-end atmosphere, or sophisticated, indeed a lot of classic questions, but also on the history of teaching had a positive guide. However, at the same time, in the examination of historical data, non-standard and unscrupulous phenomena occur from time to time, causing controversy among teachers and students and detrimental to the authority of the college entrance examination. We think that we can innovate if we are honest. When examining historical questions, we should refer to the historical materials in a normative manner and interpret the historical materials reasonably. On the basis of standardization and rationality, we should not be limited to one style and flourish. So, what is the standard?