本文指出了以实事求是作为我国现行证据制度的名称太一般化。论述了以“查证属实”作为我国现行证据制度的名称,是科学、准确的。其论据是:一、“查证属实”的表述是科学的;二、“查证属实”的表述在法律上查有依据;三、“查证属实”的表述,科学地反映了我国现行证据制度的本质特点。 This paper points out that the name of seeking truth from facts as the current evidence system in our country is too general. It is scientifically and accurately that the name of “the evidence true” is used as the current evidence system in our country. The argument is: First, “verification is true ” is a scientific statement; “Verification is true ” in the legal basis for the investigation; Third, “verification is true ” statement, scientifically reflected The Essential Characteristics of Our Present Evidence System.