论文部分内容阅读
经济纠纷案执行难,银行借贷案执行更难已成为社会关注的焦点。在长沙地区的农行系统,浏阳市农行是建立法律顾问室最早,与当地法院关系最为密切的支行之一。该行1995年贷款纠纷起诉18起,标的350余万元,而仅全面执行了3起,部分执行14起,收回贷款本息78万元。这个结果是不令人满意的,其原因除与其它经济纠纷案有共同之处(诸如“地方保护主义”“三角债”等)外,还有其特殊性。笔者作为银行的一名法律顾问,现结合自己的工作实际,就此作一些分析。
The implementation of economic disputes is difficult and the implementation of bank lending more difficult has become the focus of society. Agricultural Bank of China in Changsha area system, Liuyang Agricultural Bank is the establishment of the first legal advisory room, one of the most closely related to the local court branch. The Bank prosecuted 18 loan disputes in 1995 with a target of more than 3.5 million yuan. Only 3 cases were fully implemented, some were implemented in 14 cases, and the principal and interest of loans were withdrawn at 780,000 yuan. This result is not satisfactory. The reason for this is that it has its own particularity in addition to other economic disputes (such as “local protectionism” and “triangular debt”). As a legal advisor to the bank, I now make some analyzes in light of my own work.