二战硝烟落下后,一个迫切的问题是各交战国手里的战犯咋办。苏联最初主张分头各自处理。经有关各方研究,决定还是统一审讯为宜。一则这样量刑可以更公道,分开来有轻有重,不好向世人交待,更主要的是这样集中公开审讯的教育价值。让他们的罪行大白于天下。既对战犯本人及其家属,也对历史负责。通过审讯,可以让世人了解那帮纳粹犯的是何等严重罪行,也让他们的同情者明白邪恶终有绳之以法的一天。倘若推到后院枪毙了事,那就会失去一个以儆效尤的大好机会。 After the smoke of World War II dropped, an urgent question was whether war criminals in the belligerent countries should be accustomed. The Soviet Union initially advocated separately. After the parties concerned study, it is advisable to decide or unite the trial. One such sentencing can be more fair, separate light and heavy, not good to explain to the world, but more important is the focus of public trial of the educational value. Let their crimes clear to the world. Both to the war criminals and their families, but also to history. Through interrogation, the world can be made aware of the serious crimes committed by the Nazis and their sympathizers, who understand the day when evil will eventually be brought to justice. If pushed to the backyard and shot, it will lose a great opportunity to take effect.