论文部分内容阅读
对数量越来越多的地区联合的影响的看法依然存在着分歧:支持者认为,它是对多边贸易自由化努力的有意义的补充,是在全球消除经济交流中所有障碍道路上一个实际的中间站。这种自由化只有通过艰辛和长期的国际谈判才能实现。地区一体化也许对多边自由化进程是一种刺激。批评者则认为,正式的一体化背离了多边自由化原则,对全球福利有消极后果。在贸易、服务和资本流动中的地区优惠必然含有对第三者的歧视。它是一种制度化的以邻为壑的政策,强化了地区封闭的趋向,最终将导致世界经济分化成受保护主义保护的经济集团。
There is still disagreement about the influence of an increasing number of regional coalitions: supporters believe that it is a meaningful complement to multilateral trade liberalization efforts and an actual one on the road to global elimination of all barriers in economic exchanges. Intermediate station. This kind of liberalization can only be achieved through hard and long-term international negotiations. Regional integration may be a stimulus to multilateral liberalization. Critics argue that formal integration deviates from the principles of multilateral liberalization and has negative consequences for global welfare. Regional preferences in trade, services and capital flows necessarily contain discrimination against third parties. It is an institutionalized, beggar-thy-neighbor policy that reinforces the trend of regional closure and eventually leads to the division of the world economy into protectionist economic groups.