在中国近代思想文化史上,严复和梁启超是两个杰出的代表性人物。他们一个着力译书,系统介绍西方近代哲学社会科学理论,堪称理论之源;一个致力办报,传播西方文化,堪称舆论之母。但是二人之间的关系却非常微妙。以往学术界针对严复在清末民初讽喻和指责梁启超进行过比较深入的研究,但对梁启超的反应基本未予涉及。本文从梁著《清代学术概论》入手,于不疑处起疑,借用烘云托月的手法,通过将梁启超与同时代其他学者进行比较,力图勾勒出梁氏著作在论及严复思想时存在的“凹陷”现象,并分析了梁启超对严复批评保持“沉默”的原因。 In the history of modern Chinese thought and culture, Yan Fu and Liang Qichao are two distinguished representative figures. One of them devoted themselves to translating books and systematically introducing the theory of social sciences in modern Western philosophy is the source of theory; one that is devoted to reporting and spreading western culture is the mother of public opinion. But the relationship between the two is very subtle. In the past, academics conducted rigorous research on Yan Fu’s allegory and accusation of Liang Qichao at the end of the Qing Dynasty and the beginning of the Republic of China, but the reaction to Liang Qichao was basically not covered. This article begins with Liang An Introduction to Academic Studies in Qing Dynasty, starts from suspicion undoubtedly, and borrows the method of drying up the moon and clouds. By comparing Liang Qichao with other scholars of the same era, this article attempts to outline the existence of Liang’s works when discussing Yan Fu’s thoughts “Depression ” phenomenon, and analyzed Liang Qichao’s criticism of Yan Fu to maintain “silent” reason.