论文部分内容阅读
二审判决对赔偿的履行期限和方式作了调整,这远比“天价赔偿”数额更具新意和深意,更具有“标本式”的“里程碑”意义。因为环境公益诉讼对环境的保护,不光是惩治违法,让那些环境污染损害的制造者付出沉痛的经济代价,还要考虑怎样避免重蹈覆辙、怎样有效预防。经过一审和二审三次开庭审理,2014年12月29日,江苏省高级人民法院对被众多媒体称为“史无前例”的、“里程碑式”的、“天价赔偿”的泰州环境公益诉讼案做出终审判决:维持泰州中院一审做出的赔偿160666745.11
The ruling of the second instance made an adjustment to the deadline and way for the performance of compensation, which is far more innovative and profound than the amount of “high price compensation” and more of a “landmark ” meaning of “specimen type ”. Because environmental public interest litigation environmental protection, not only punish illegal, so that those who damage environmental pollution manufacturers pay a heavy economic cost, but also consider how to avoid repeating the same mistakes and how to effectively prevent. After the first trial and the second trial three trial, December 29, 2014, Jiangsu Provincial Higher People’s Court on many media as “unprecedented”, “milestone”, “high price compensation ” Taizhou environment Public interest litigation case to make a final judgment: to maintain the first instance of Taizhou Intermediate Court made compensation 160666745.11