This article reviews and thinks something hot the study of Huimo (秽貊) nations. The viewpoint of the author is that the records of the history about Hui (秽) and Mo (貊) in the early documents are not correct. This is related to “the idea of the Big China” and the conception of history “using today’s view to study the ancient society” in the mind of some ancient scholars. The Hut and Mo in the Han dynasty (汉朝) were not present as a nation in remote antiquity. They were not the same concept mentioned in the earlier documents. The area of Hui or Mo nation in foe Han dynasty was not spreading to all of the orient. The Huiren (秽 人), whose leader was Nanlu (南闾) managed by Canghai Jun (苍海郡), was not in the northeast continent but in korea peninsula. It is unbelievable for the view of Fuyu (夫余) belonged to Huiren. The essential pat of Fuyu’s culture is Shangzhou ’ s (商周) culture which belonged to Hua Xia (华夏) nation, and the next is Rongren’s (戎人) culture. It is difficut to find out the position of Huiren’s culture. This article reviews and thinks something hot the study of Huimo (Filipino) nations. The viewpoint of the author is that the the records of the history about Hui (秽) and Mo (貊) in the early documents are not correct. to “the idea of ​​the Big China ” and the conception of history “using today’s view to study the ancient society ” in the mind of some ancient scholars. The Hut and Mo in the Han dynasty (汉朝) were not The area of ​​Hui or Mo nation in foe Han dynasty was not spreading to all of the orient. The Huiren (秽人), whose leader was It is unbelievable for the view of Fuyu belonged to Huiren. The essential pat of Fuyu’s culture is Shangzhou (南) managed by Canghai Jun (苍海 郡), was not in the northeast continent but in korea peninsula. ’s (商 周) culture which belonged to Hua Xia nation, and the next is Rongren’s (荣 人 的) It is difficut to find out the position of Huiren’s culture.