论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨分析胺碘酮治疗快速型心律失常的临床效果,总结其临床价值。方法:收治快速型心律失常患者100例,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组50例,对照组给予利多卡因等常规西药进行治疗,观察组在对照组治疗基础上给予胺碘酮进行治疗,观察和比较两组不同治疗方法对快速型心律失常的临床疗效。结果:观察组显效20例,有效25例,无效5例,总有效率为90.00%。对照组显效16例,有效21例,无效13例,总有效率为74.00%。两组疗效比较,具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。观察组疗效优于对照组。结论:胺碘酮治疗快速型心律失常具有较好的临床疗效,是治疗快速型心律失常的有效方法之一,具有较好的临床价值。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of amiodarone in the treatment of tachyarrhythmia and to summarize its clinical value. Methods: One hundred patients with tachyarrhythmia were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 50 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional western medicine such as lidocaine. The observation group was given amiodarone on the basis of the control group The clinical effects of two different treatment methods on tachyarrhythmia were observed and compared. Results: In observation group, 20 cases were markedly effective, 25 cases were effective and 5 cases were ineffective. The total effective rate was 90.00%. The control group was markedly effective in 16 cases, effective in 21 cases, ineffective in 13 cases, the total effective rate was 74.00%. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05). Observation group was better than the control group. Conclusion: Amiodarone has a good clinical curative effect in the treatment of tachyarrhythmia. It is an effective method to treat tachyarrhythmia and has good clinical value.