论文部分内容阅读
1994年2月5日,被告新疆维吾尔自治区农机安全监理总站兵团分站及农二师农机安全监理所的代理律师与原告农二师二十二团五连许冬英的代理律师在博克西垦区人民法院主持的公开审理关于《许冬英不服自治区农机安全监理总站兵团分站(1992)1号复议决定》一案.经过长达三个半小时的法庭辩论,最终博克西垦区人民法院以(1994)博垦行初字第1号行政判决书判决如下:维特新疆维吾尔自治区农机安全监理总站兵团分站1992年12月7日兵团农机监理(1992)1号复议决定.案件的受理费由原告负担.如不服本判决,可在判决书送达之日起15日内,向本院递交上诉状并按对方当事人的人数提出副本,上诉于农二师中级人民法院.
On February 5, 1994, the defendant, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Agricultural Machinery Safety Supervision Corps sub-station and Nongsan Nongsi Machinery Safety Supervision Agency’s attorney and the plaintiff Nongfushang twenty-two regiment Wu Lian Dongying attorney in the Boxer Reclamation People’s Court Presided over the public hearing on the “Xu Dongying dissatisfaction with the autonomous region Farm Machinery Safety Supervision Corps Sub-station (1992) No. 1 reconsideration decision.” After three and a half hours of court debate, the final Boxi Reclamation District Court (1994) The verdict of the first line of the first line of administrative judgment is as follows: Veterinary Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Agricultural Machinery Safety Supervision Corps Corps Sub-station December 7, 1992 Corps Agricultural Machinery Supervision (1992) No. 1 reconsideration decision.The admissibility of the case by the plaintiff .Such as this The verdict may be submitted to the Court within 15 days from the date of delivery of the judgment, and a copy of the appeal party shall be filed according to the number of the other party, appealing to the Nong No.2 Intermediate People’s Court.