论文部分内容阅读
目的比较传统巴氏涂片和液基薄层细胞学检测法在宫颈癌筛查中的应用效果。方法选取2014年1月-2016年6月在医院进行健康体检的女性800例,依次采用传统巴氏涂片检查法及液基薄层细胞学检测法进行检测。对比2组宫颈癌检出结果及制片质量和检验成本。结果液基薄层细胞学检测法检出宫颈癌阳性114例(14.25%)高于传统巴氏涂片检查法的75例(9.38%)(P<0.05)。液基薄层细胞学检测法制片质量明显优于传统巴氏涂片检查法(P<0.05)。但2种检查方法的检查成本并无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论在健康体检中采用液基薄层细胞学检测法对受试对象进行宫颈癌的筛查其检测结果更加准确,值得在临床广泛推广应用。
Objective To compare the effect of traditional Pap smear and liquid-based TLC in the screening of cervical cancer. Methods One hundred and eighty women who took physical examination in hospital from January 2014 to June 2016 were selected and tested by traditional Pap smear and liquid-based TLC. Contrast 2 groups of cervical cancer detection results and production quality and testing costs. Results The smear-based cytology test showed that the positive rate of cervical cancer in 114 cases (14.25%) was higher than that in the traditional Pap smear test (9.38%) (P <0.05). Liquid-based thin-layer cytology was significantly superior to the traditional Pap smear method (P <0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two methods (P> 0.05). Conclusion The test results of cervical cancer screening by liquid-based TLC in healthy physical examination are more accurate and worthy of wide application in clinic.