论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】鉴定机构根据一方当事人申请,以原鉴定结论存在程序瑕疵为由撤销了原决定。但该当事人拒绝进行重新鉴定,仅以撤销决定构成新证据为由提出申诉。法院审查发现司法鉴定中心原鉴定结论正确,仅存在程序瑕疵,该程序上的瑕疵并不影响原鉴定结果的准确性、客观性、公正性,对案件事实的认定不产生影响,不足以推翻原判决的相应判项,应认定撤销决定不符合民事诉讼法第一百七十九条第一款第(一)项关于新证据的规定。
【Referee essence】 According to the application of one party, the appraisal agency revoked the original decision on the ground that there was a flaw in the original appraisal conclusion. However, the party refused to re-appraise and filed a complaint only on the ground that the revocation decision constituted new evidence. The court found that the forensic center of the original appraisal conclusion is correct, there are only procedural flaws, the procedural flaws do not affect the accuracy of the original appraisal results, objectivity, impartiality, the fact that the case does not have an impact on the identification, not enough to overthrow the original The corresponding judgment of the judgment shall be that the revocation decision does not conform to the provisions of item (1) of the first paragraph of Article 179 of the Civil Procedure Law regarding the new evidence.