论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较MSCPR-1A心肺复苏机和人工心肺复苏2种方法的临床效果。方法:53例心跳呼吸骤停患者分为心肺复苏机复苏组和人工标准复苏组,比较2组优缺点及循环、呼吸恢复率。结果:使用心肺复苏机进行心肺复苏,患者的循环和呼吸恢复率均高于人工标准心肺复苏(CPR),而且可以克服人工CPR的缺陷。结论:心肺复苏机与人工心肺复苏相比具有较大的优越性,可以提高复苏质量,值得在临床推广。
Objective: To compare the clinical effects of two methods of MSCPR-1A cardiopulmonary resuscitation and artificial cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods: Fifty-three patients with cardiac arrest and resuscitation were divided into two groups: CPR resuscitation group and artificial standard resuscitation group. The advantages and disadvantages, circulatory and respiratory recovery rate were compared between the two groups. Results: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with CPR performed better in both circulatory and respiratory recovery than in artificial standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and was able to overcome the limitations of artificial CPR. Conclusion: Compared with artificial cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation has great superiority and can improve the quality of resuscitation, which is worthy of clinical promotion.