论文部分内容阅读
关于《人工授精,难倒法院》一案,我有以下主张。 第一,原告与被告在婚姻存续期间,是一对合法合理的配偶。生育是双方共同的愿望和客观必然。因被告性能力不完全,未能生育。为达到双方共同的生育愿望,借助于现代科学技术,施行人工授他体精生育。生育结果产生了自然血缘关系外的相关关系是本案的焦点。在这种关系中,母体是相对现代科学技术,不是相对他体自然人。提供精子的他体,也相对于现代科学技
With regard to the case of “artificial insemination and trouble preventing the court”, I have the following opinions. First, the plaintiff and the defendant are legal and reasonable spouses during the marriage. Reproduction is the common aspiration and objective necessity of both sides. Due to the defendant’s sexual ability is not complete, unable to have children. In order to achieve common aspirations of both parents and children, with the help of modern science and technology, the practice of giving birth and nurturing him finely has been implemented. The correlation between the fertility outcome and the natural kinship is the focus of this case. In this relationship, the mother is relatively modern science and technology, not relative to other natural persons. The body that provides sperm is also relative to modern science and technology