论文部分内容阅读
从世界范围看,全球经济增长速度明显放慢,各国企业之间的竞争日益激烈,发达国家政府为保护本国企业的利益纷纷对他国产品设置重重障碍。反倾销是世界贸易组织允许的少数合法的措施之一, 由于程序简便易行、能够有效排斥进口商品而被发达国家广泛采用。2004年7月6日,美国商务部初步裁定中国和越南对美国的虾出口存在倾销行为,并于12月30日最终裁定两国对美的虾出口存在倾销行为,决定维持初步裁定,对从两国进口的虾征收27.9%至112.8%的惩罚性关税。本文对虾出口企业遭受反倾销诉讼的原因作出分析,并为其提出若干应对策略,希望为企业更好的解决这一贸易纠纷提供某些借鉴。
Globally, the growth rate of the global economy has obviously slowed down. The competition among enterprises in various countries is becoming increasingly fierce. Developed country governments have set numerous obstacles to other countries’ products in order to protect the interests of their own enterprises. Anti-dumping is one of the few legal measures allowed by the World Trade Organization. It is widely adopted by developed countries for its simple and easy procedure and its ability to effectively exclude imported goods. On July 6, 2004, the U.S. Department of Commerce ruled initially that China and Vietnam are dumping shrimp exports to the United States. On December 30, the United States Department of Commerce finally ruled that the two countries are dumping shrimp exports to the United States and decided to uphold the preliminary ruling. Shrimp imports from China impose a punitive tariff of 27.9% to 112.8%. This article analyzes the reasons why shrimp exporters suffer anti-dumping litigation and proposes some coping strategies for them, hoping to provide some reference for enterprises to solve this trade dispute better.