论文部分内容阅读
一百多年來,美國对華的侵略始終遵循着一个原则,這個原則便是所謂的門戶開放政策。美国侵略者過去在中国所作的一切重要活动,若梢加分析,就可看出事事都和推行‘門戶開放政策’、从而最后变全中国为美国的殖民地这一恶毒意图有着密切的关系。‘門戶開放政策’是和‘自由放任’(I.aissez-faire)的理論分不开的,把这个理论應用到国际政治和经济上来,便產生了所謂的門戶開放原則。所以从根本上说,‘門戶開放政策’只不過是资本主义国家间争夺殖民地的一種方式,它最初從要求在某一地域的機會均等和利益均霑開始,但最终目的則是在於獨占和垄断這個地域中的一切‘利益’,企图在競爭的過程中逐漸排斥其他资本主义国家的势力,使這個地域全部成为自己的囊中之物。以剛果為例,在它正式成為比利時的殖民地以前,列强何嘗不曾在該地實行‘門戶開放政策’,維持過商业机会均等的原則? 如所週知,一八九九年美国務卿海約翰(John Hay)宣佈門戶開放原
For more than 100 years, the U.S. aggression against China has always followed the principle that this is the so-called open door policy. If we analyze all the important activities the United States invaders have done in China in the past, we can see that everything is closely linked with the vicious intention of pushing for the “open door policy” and eventually turning China into a colony of the United States. The “open door policy” is inseparable from the I.aissez-faire theory. Applying this theory to international politics and economy leads to the so-called principle of open door. Therefore, fundamentally speaking, the ’open door policy’ is only a way of fighting for colony among capitalist countries. It initially starts with the requirement of equal opportunity and interests in a certain geographical area, but the ultimate goal is to monopolize and monopolize this In the process of competition, it gradually excludes the forces of other capitalist countries and makes this area an all-embracing matter. Take the Congo as an example. Before it officially became a Belgian colony, why did the powers not implement the ’open door policy’ there and upheld the principle of equal opportunity in business? As we all know, in 1889, Secretary of State Hay John (John Hay) announced the open door