论文部分内容阅读
澳门终审法院近期对两宗人身保护令案件的裁判,一再凸显澳门与内地移交逃犯方面的法律困境,虽有权宜之策,但终非久计。两地在移交原则(拒绝移交的理由)上的分歧为主要症结所在。对此,需要准确把握内地与澳门为“一国”内的“两地”;而澳门《刑事司法互助法》相关条文亦对未来协议的建立具有文本上的示范意义。
The recent CFA Judgment on the two cases of habeas corpus repeatedly highlighted the legal difficulties in the surrender of fugitive offenders from Macao and the Mainland. Although there is an expedient measure, it will eventually be ruled out. The differences between the two places on the principle of transfer (the reason for refusing handover) are the main cruxes. In this regard, it is necessary to accurately grasp that the Mainland and Macao are the “two places” within the “one country” and the relevant provisions of the Macao Law on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters also provide a textual demonstration of the future agreement.