历来对古代汉语中复词偏义的成因有各种不同解说,对于“足句辞”诸说、“连及”诸说、“病辞”诸说、“讳饰”诸说等,各有其合理之处,但也各有其龃龉不合之处,均未能有效解释复词偏义的成因。而对各家解说进行梳理和评析,有利于总结出以往对于复词偏义成因的研究状况和得失,对偏义复词的进一步研究具有参考价值。 Historically, there have been various explanations for the causes of complex meanings in ancient Chinese. For the purposes of “footer ”, “” and “ ”And so on, each have their own reasonable place, but also have their own differences, are unable to effectively explain the causes of complex meanings. However, sorting out and commenting on various explanations is helpful to summarize the research status and gains and losses on the genesis of compound biases in the past, which is of reference value for the further study of the compound words.