论文部分内容阅读
【目的】探讨我国学者被撤销论文在国际上的总体位置与严重程度。【方法】从国际网站Retraction Watch上搜集与统计撤销论文公告数的有关情况,从作者类型、国别、期刊、撤销论文原因等方面进行了统计分析。另外分析了各发文大国撤销论文数与万篇发文量的相关性及二者比值(定义为撤销发文比,RPR)。【结果】在撤销论文公告数量中,美国高居榜首,中国居第2位,各国发文数与撤销论文数相关系数达0.968(P<0.001)。各发文大国RPR均数为1.60,排在前3位的为荷兰、印度和美国,我国排第11位。从撤销论文原因看,前5位分别为图像造假、抄袭剽窃、重复发表、数据造假和结果不可重复。涉及期刊较多,知名期刊的撤销论文数比普通期刊多。【结论】因被撤销论文多为造假或错误论文,影响巨大且久远,所以期刊界必须提高防范学术不端论文的意识与能力,并与政府部门、科学共同体等一起共同构建好集防范与惩治为一体的治理学术不端行为的制度与体系。
【Objective】 To explore the international position and severity of the dismissed dissertations of Chinese scholars. 【Method】 The paper collects and analyzes the numbers of published papers from Retraction Watch on the international website, and makes statistical analysis on the author type, country, periodical and the reasons for revoking the paper. In addition, the correlation between the number of withdrawal papers and the number of papers published by each large sending country and the ratio between the two (defined as revoked writing ratio, RPR) was also analyzed. 【Results】 The United States ranked the top of the list of dismissed papers and the second highest in China with a correlation coefficient of 0.968 (P <0.001). The RPR average of sending countries is 1.60, ranking the top 3 for the Netherlands, India and the United States, ranking 11th in our country. The reasons for the revocation of the paper, the top 5 were fake images, plagiarism plagiarism, repeated publication, data fraud and the results can not be repeated. There are more journals involved, and there are more withdrawals of well-known journals than regular journals. 【Conclusion】 Since the dismissed papers are mostly fake or misdirected papers, the impact is huge and long, so journals must raise their awareness and ability to prevent academic misconduct papers, and work together with government agencies, science communities and other organizations to prevent fraud and punish As one of the system of governing academic misconduct and system.