论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨与研究急性左心衰合并哮喘的急诊处理措施以及临床疗效。方法本研究选择来我院接受治疗患有急性左心衰合并哮喘疾病患者40例作为研究对象,病例患者所选日期为2014年2月至2015年2月,所有患者之间无明显差异,具有对比性意义,将其分为观察组与对照组,各组20例。对对照组患者给予单纯西药治疗,而对观察组患者的治疗方法是在对照组患者的治疗基础上给予静脉推注速尿、呼衰合剂、立其丁及硝普钠等药物进行干预,对比两组患者的临床疗效。结果观察组患者的临床总有效率为95.0%,而对照组患者的临床总有效率为75.0%,两组患者之间存在有明显差异,具有统计学意义。结论在急性左心衰合并哮喘临床治疗活动中,给予单纯西药+静脉推注速尿、呼衰合剂、立其丁及硝普钠等药物进行干预,以帮助患者缓解临床急诊病症,提高患者的生活质量。
Objective To investigate and study emergency treatment of acute left heart failure with asthma and its clinical efficacy. Methods Forty patients with acute left heart failure and asthma who were treated in our hospital were selected as the study subjects. The patients were selected from February 2014 to February 2015 with no significant difference between all patients. Comparative significance, divided into observation group and control group, 20 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were treated with western medicine alone, while patients in the observation group were treated with drugs such as intravenous furosemide, Hu Huo Huai Li, Li Ding Ding and sodium nitroprusside on the basis of the treatment of patients in the control group, Clinical efficacy of two groups of patients. Results The total clinical effective rate in observation group was 95.0%, while that in control group was 75.0%. There was a significant difference between the two groups of patients with statistical significance. Conclusions In the clinical treatment of acute left heart failure complicated with asthma, western medicine and intravenous injection of furosemide, Hu Huosheng, Lidian and sodium nitroprusside were given to intervention in order to help patients relieve the clinical emergency and improve the patients’ Quality of Life.