用“美丽”一词造句,学生写道:“公园里很美丽。”另一学生写道:“公园里很美丽。那里有成排的树木,有鲜艳的花朵,有建造别致的凉亭。”教师批改时,肯定了第一例造句,而删去了第二例造句的后边部分,并加评语:“以后造句,不要借词发挥。”第一例造句,对“美丽”一词的运用是正确的,句子的成分结构及内容的表达也无懈可击,给予肯定,无可置疑。第二例造句,它与第一例造句的不同之处是:不仅说“公园很美丽”,而且又紧接着对公园的“美丽”作了具体的描述。此乃“发挥”之所在!是允许肯定这种发挥,还是制止否定这种发挥,人们的意见是不一致的。一种意见认为,造句嘛,只要把词(指供造句的词)用上啦,句子短则为佳,免得句长“错”多,弄 With the word “beautiful,” the student wrote: “The park is beautiful,” wrote another student: “The park is beautiful, with rows of trees, brightly colored flowers and chic pavilions.” Teacher approval, affirmed the first case of sentence, and delete the second case behind the sentence, and add comments: “After the sentence, do not borrow words to play.” The first case of the sentence, the “beautiful” is the use of the word is Correct, the composition of the sentence structure and content of the expression is also impeccable, affirmed, no doubt. The second example is that it differs from the first one in that it not only states “the park is beautiful,” but also specifically describes the “beauty” of the park. This is where “giving play” is to permit the affirmation of such play, or to stop the denial of such play, and the opinions of the people are not consistent. One opinion holds that as long as the words (for words that make sentences) are used, short sentences are better, so that the sentence length is “wrong” and more