分析结构实在论的三个不同版本,表明建构的结构实在论是基于对前两种版本批判的基础上发展起来的。通过对科学认识中几个关键哲学概念连续性是否可能的分析,表明建构的结构实在论无法维护理论实体具有连续性的观点。然而,建构的结构实在论所提出的“经验约束”思想,以及通过结构来认识实体的辩护策略,可以一定程度上回应反实在论的挑战。 Analysis of three different versions of structural realism shows that the constructed structural realism is based on the critique of the first two versions. Through the analysis of the possibility of continuity of several key philosophical concepts in scientific understanding, it shows that the constructed structural realism can not maintain the continuity of theoretical entities. However, the structural empiricism’s “experience constraints ” thought, as well as through the structure to understand the entity’s defense strategy, can to some extent respond to the challenge of anti-realism.