论文部分内容阅读
20世纪20年代,经梁启超创论,中国史学史研究逐渐兴起,历经近九十年的发展,各种专著层涌叠现,成果丰硕。然而较为遗憾的是,在各种以“史学史”命名的著作中,历代“实录”始终未能引起学者足够的重视,或语焉不详,或竟付诸阙如。众所周知,中国传统史学,存在着官方与私家两条并行发展的轨道。“实录”作为官方史学的重要组成部分,始于南朝萧梁,历唐、宋、元迄于明、清,代有编纂,相沿不辍。不仅极富文献史料价值,而且具有十分重要的史体理论价值。缘此,缺少了“实录”的史学史叙述,终究不能完
In the 1920s, after Liang Qichao created his work, the history of Chinese historiography began to rise gradually. After nearly 90 years of development, all kinds of monographs were flourishing and fruitful. However, it is even more regrettable that in all kinds of books named after “History of Historiography”, the “Records of the Past” of the past dynasties failed to attract enough attention from scholars, or did not elaborate or make any mistakes. As we all know, the traditional Chinese history, there are two parallel official and private development track. “Record” as an important part of the official historiography, began in the Southern Dynasties Xiao Liang, calendar Tang, Song, Yuan as of Ming, Qing, on behalf of a compilation, with no stops. It is not only highly historical value of literature, but also has very important historical value. As a result, the lack of “Record ” historical history narrative, after all, can not be completed