论文部分内容阅读
熊某某于2000年8月受聘于某有限公司,在外扇组从事电焊工作。2002年6月26日,熊某某等四人受公司指派,到某小区售楼部安装遮阳铁凉棚。6月27日下午3时20分左右,熊某某在工作过程中,因电源插座漏电触电并摔伤,后送往医院治疗。2002年7月22日,熊某某在住院期间死亡。劳动行政部门于2002年8月2日作出《工伤认定函》,认定熊某某所受伤害为工伤。裁决该公司一次性支付死亡补偿费人民币275000元和丧葬费人民币3500元。2002年8月14日,该公司以工伤认定尚处于行政复议和行政诉讼时效内未生效为由,申请中止本案的审理。[争议焦点]本案在审理过程中,该公司以工伤认定尚未发生法律效力为由,申请中止对本案的仲裁审理。本案是否应中止审
Xiong Moumou employed in August 2000 in a limited company, in the outer fan welding work. June 26, 2002, Xiong Moumou and other four companies assigned by the sales department to install a sunshade pergola. June 27 at about 3:20 pm, Xiong Moumou in the course of their work, because of electrical outlet leakage and electric shock and falls, then rushed to the hospital for treatment. July 22, 2002, Xiong Moumou died during hospitalization. On August 2, 2002, the labor administration department made the “Letter of Accreditation for Work-related Injury” and found that Xiong Moumou was injured as a work-related injury. The company ruled that the company should pay a one-time payment of RMB275,000 for death compensation and RMB3,500 for funeral expenses. August 14, 2002, the company finds that work-related injuries are still in administrative reconsideration and administrative litigation within the limitation does not take effect as the grounds for the suspension of the trial of the case. [Dispute Focus] In the trial of the case, the company applied for suspending the arbitration hearing of the case on the ground that the work-related injury has not yet been found to have legal effect. Whether this case should be suspended trial