论文部分内容阅读
同行评议制度是科技期刊质量的基本保障。同行评议在期刊的多年应用实践表明,其过程中存在一些不足或局限,如不积极应对将有损期刊发展,阻碍正确的科学传播。总结了科技期刊同行评议过程中存在的不确定性,并针对这些不确定性提出编辑的角色应对,以期有效规避同行评议局限性带来的风险,促进科技期刊的稳定发展和科学技术的正确传播。
Peer review system is the basic guarantee of the quality of sci-tech periodicals. Peer review in journals for many years of practical application shows that there are some shortcomings or limitations in the process, if not actively respond to will undermine the development of journals, hinder the correct dissemination of science. Summarizes the uncertainty existing in the process of peer review of sci-tech periodicals and puts forward the editors’ role response to these uncertainties in order to effectively avoid the risks brought by the limitations of peer review and to promote the stable development of sci-tech periodicals and the correct dissemination of science and technology .