论文部分内容阅读
从行为选择和学术产品的角度,可以分析预测论文引证在数量和质量方面变化的趋势。通过调查1993—2002年《中国社会科学》和《中外法学》两期刊法学论文的引证和外部引证,一方面检验了引证竞争的假说,同时显示了这个时期中国法学受到法学外学科影响的程度和特点。从整体上看,法学论文引证的数量竞争已经进行,而质量竞争尚未发展,外部引证率并没有明显提高;当代中国法学的另一面可能是更多的自我对话、甚至封闭。
From the perspective of behavioral choice and academic products, we can analyze the trend of changes in quantity and quality of forecasted papers. By examining the quotations and external citations of the legal papers of China Social Sciences and Chinese and Foreign Legal Systems from 1993 to 2002, this paper tests the hypothesis of citation competition and at the same time shows the extent to which Chinese jurisprudence is influenced by the extrajudicial subjects Features. On the whole, the quantitative competition cited in legal papers has been carried out, but the quality competition has not yet developed, and the external citation rate has not significantly improved. On the other hand, contemporary Chinese jurisprudence may be more self-dialogue or even closed.