论文部分内容阅读
民事法律行为的解释一般分为阐明解释和补充解释两大类型。在阐明解释,应依被解释法律行为的不同类型而分别坚持表示主义或意思主义。我国《合同法》尚未确认合同的补充解释,但依法理确有通过补充解释来填补合同漏洞之必要。对遗嘱的解释应充分尊重遗嘱人的内心真意,如果允许法官对其补充解释,则属过分干预。
The interpretation of civil legal acts generally divided into clarification and explanation of the two major types of explanations. In elucidating the explanation, one should insist on representationalism or philosophicalism, respectively, according to the different types of legal acts being interpreted. China’s “Contract Law” has not confirmed the supplementary explanation of the contract, but according to the law there is indeed the need to supplement the explanation to fill the loopholes in the contract. The testament interpretation should fully respect the true nature of the testator, and if the judge is allowed to supplement it, it would be unduly interfering.