论文部分内容阅读
《最高人民法院关于审理旅游纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的规定》未对旅游经营者间和旅游经营者与旅游辅助服务者间或者旅游经营者与第三人间发生的纠纷进行规定,导致相互间对法律关系性质的认定,旅游经营者向旅游者赔偿后能否向其他旅游经营者、旅游辅助服务者、第三人提起赔偿诉讼,能否提起不真正连带诉讼很有争议。本文试从现有规定、理论及实际出发,论及旅游经营者间、旅游经营者与旅游辅助服务者间并非是委托关系,旅游经营者也有权向其他旅游经营者、旅游辅助服务者及其他义务请求不真正连带责任赔偿。
The Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Travel Dispute Cases do not stipulate disputes among tour operators and between tour operators and travel auxiliary service providers or between tour operators and third parties, The legal nature of the relationship between the tourist operators to compensate the tourists to other tour operators, travel support services, the third party to bring a lawsuit for compensation, whether to bring a real joint litigation is controversial. This article attempts to proceed from the existing regulations, theories and practices, and discusses the relationship between the tour operators, the tour operator and the travel assistant, not the entrusted relationship, and the tour operator also has the right to inform other tour operators, travel support service providers and others Obligation does not really claim compensation.