论文部分内容阅读
刑法中的具体方法错误的性质、理论归属以及如何处理,在刑法理论上一直是争论比较激烈的地方。关于如何处理,存在着具体符合说、法定符合说以及犯罪计划说等三种不同的学说,采取何种处理原则,直接关系到行为人是否构成犯罪、构成何种犯罪以及犯罪既遂还是未遂等重要问题。本文在对不同学说进行比较分析的基础上,笔者提出法定符合说有利于平等地保护法益,有利于实现刑罚目的,符合罪刑法定原则的宗旨,更具合理性,笔者认为应当坚守。
The specific nature of the mistakes in the criminal law, the theory of attribution and how to deal with it has always been a controversial topic in the criminal law theory. There are three different doctrines of how to handle, there are three different doctrines of specific conformance, legal conformance and criminal plan, and the principle of what is dealt with is directly related to whether the perpetrator constitutes a crime, what kind of crime is constituted, and whether the crime is accomplished or attempted problem. Based on the comparative analysis of different theories, the author puts forward the principle of statutory conformity that is beneficial to the protection of legal interests equally, which is in line with the purpose of punishment and punishment, and is more reasonable.