论文部分内容阅读
在欧元正式进入流通领域以后,欧元区两个最主要的经济体——法国和德国实施的财政政策先后违反《稳定与增长公约》(以下简称《公约》)的规定,而《公约》一向被视为保障欧元稳定运行的重要基石之一。依据该公约,应对违反规定的国家实行相应的制裁以保证公约的有效性、权威性。但是,在经过激烈地争论后,欧盟财长委员会作出裁决:目前暂时不对法德两国实施经济制裁,并允许两国在2005年以前将财政赤字占GDP的比率恢复到公约规定的范围之内。这一裁决意味着,《公约》关于财政纪律的规定并不是不可动摇的,公约的权威性受到质疑,因此在欧盟内部引起很大争议。以欧洲中央银行为代表的公约权威维护派(如欧洲央行前行长杜伊森·贝赫和现任欧盟
After the euro formally entered the circulation field, the fiscal policies implemented by France and Germany, the two most important economies in the euro zone, have violated the provisions of the Stability and Growth Pact (hereinafter referred to as the “Convention”) and the Convention has always been As one of the important cornerstones to ensure the stable operation of the euro. According to the Convention, corresponding sanctions should be imposed on the countries that violate the provisions to ensure the validity and authority of the Convention. However, after fierce debate, the EU Finance Minister’s Committee ruled that the two countries should not impose economic sanctions on France and Germany at the moment, and allow both countries to return the fiscal deficit to GDP ratio within the scope of the convention before 2005 . This ruling means that the “Convention” provisions on financial discipline are not unshakable, the authority of the convention is questioned, thus causing great controversy within the EU. Convention defenders represented by the European Central Bank (such as Duisenberger, former president of the European Central Bank and the current European Union