论文部分内容阅读
自明初《剪灯新话》始,经弘治间《湖海奇闻》,直到万历间《古今清谈万选》《稗家粹编》《广艳异编》等小说选本,诗歌作者的考证,表明直到万历年间,明人颇为热衷于利用他人诗歌创作诗文小说,意在炫才与娱乐。崇祯间编刊的《幽怪诗谭》目前可知嵌有童轩等20多位文人的170多首诗歌,依据诗歌作者的生平,其中许多作品不可能是《湖海奇闻》的佚文。从不同小说嵌入相同诗歌、故事发生的时间等情况来看,《湖海奇闻》前后,一直有人以童轩等人的诗歌为骨干编撰诗文小说,但以镶嵌童轩等人的诗歌作为判断《湖海奇闻》佚文的方法并不可信。
Since the beginning of the Ming Dynasty “cutting the lamp new words”, by Hongzhi “lake anecdotes”, until the Wanli “ancient and modern Qing Tan Wanxuan” “barnyard family edited” “Guang Yan different series” and other novels, the author of the textual research, That until the Wanli years, Ming people are quite keen on using other people’s poetry to create poetry novels, intended to show off and entertainment. At present, we can see that more than 170 poems of more than 20 scholars such as Tong Xuan are embedded in the “Strange Poems Tan” compiled by Chongzhen. According to the author’s life, many of these works can not be regarded as “Lost Articles of the Lake.” From the different novels embedded in the same poetry, the story of the time of occurrence and other circumstances, before and after the “Lake”, some people have been compiled by poetry and other poetry as the backbone of poetry novels, but to mosaic Tong Xuan and other poems as judgments The method of “Lost anecdote” in LOHA is not credible.