论文部分内容阅读
目的:研究对小儿呼吸系统疾病采用超声雾化与氧气雾化方式治疗的临床效果差异。方法:选取我院近年收治的90例小儿呼吸系统疾病患者,随机分为两组,分别采用超声雾化、氧气雾化治疗。对比两组临床症状消失时间以及治疗效果差异性。结果:采用氧气雾化治疗的观察组各项临床症状均在更短时间内消失,且治疗总有效率达到100%,而采用超声雾化治疗的对照组总有效率仅为88.89%,对比之下观察组疗效更为确切。结论:治疗小儿呼吸系统疾病更应采用氧气雾化方式,在临床疗效上起效更快、效果更优,具有临床推广价值。
Objective: To study the clinical effects of ultrasonic atomization and oxygen atomization on pediatric respiratory diseases. Methods: Ninety cases of pediatric respiratory diseases admitted to our hospital in recent years were randomly divided into two groups. They were treated with ultrasonic atomization and oxygen atomization respectively. Comparison of two groups of clinical symptoms disappear time and treatment effect difference. Results: All the clinical symptoms of the observation group disappeared in a short time with oxygen atomization, and the total effective rate was 100%. The total effective rate of the control group treated with ultrasonic atomization was only 88.89% Under the observation group more specific efficacy. Conclusion: The treatment of pediatric respiratory diseases should use oxygen atomization method, the clinical efficacy of faster onset, better results, with clinical promotion value.