首先，笔者赞成第三种观点：赵男与李女的赠与关系应判为无效c理由有两点：第一：《婚姻法）第13条明确规定：“夫妻在婚姻关系存续期间所得的财产，归夫妻共同所有，又及方另有约定的除外。夫妻双方共同所有的财产，有平等的处理权。”结合本案，赵男为夺女所购房屋应为赵男与 First of all, I agree with the third view: the relationship between the gift of Zhao and Li is null and void. C There are two reasons for this: First, Article 13 of the Marriage Law clearly stipulates that “property acquired by husband and wife during the marriage, Owned by both husband and wife, except as otherwise agreed upon by the parties, the property jointly owned by both parties shall have equal treatment. ”In connection with this case, Zhao Nan